Legislature(2023 - 2024)
2024-02-14 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2024-02-14 House Journal Page 1499 HB 143 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 143 "An Act relating to the Department of Environmental Conservation; relating to advanced recycling and advanced recycling facilities; relating to waste; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page RES RPT CS(RES) 5DP 2DNP 1AM 871 FN1: ZERO(DEC) 871 L&C RPT CS(RES) 5DP 2AM 1342 FN2: ZERO(DEC) 1342 2024-02-14 House Journal Page 1500 Representative Saddler moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 143(RES) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Mears: Page 4, lines 16 - 20: Delete all material. Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Representative Mears moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative McKay objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 143(RES) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Armstrong, Carpenter, Carrick, Dibert, Eastman, Fields, Galvin, Gray, Groh, Hannan, Himschoot, Josephson, McCormick, Mears, Mina, Ortiz, Schrage, Story, Stutes Nays: Allard, Baker, Coulombe, Cronk, Edgmon, Foster, C.Johnson, D.Johnson, McCabe, McKay, Prax, Rauscher, Ruffridge, Saddler, Shaw, Stapp, Sumner, Tilton, Tomaszewski, Vance, Wright And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was not offered. 2024-02-14 House Journal Page 1501 Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 5, line 5, following "and other recycled products": Insert ", and that does not rely on government subsidies to continue in operation" Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative McKay objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 143(RES) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Armstrong, Carrick, Dibert, Eastman, Galvin, Gray, Groh, Hannan, Himschoot, Josephson, Mears, Mina, Ortiz, Schrage, Stutes Nays: Allard, Baker, Carpenter, Coulombe, Cronk, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, C.Johnson, D.Johnson, McCabe, McCormick, McKay, Prax, Rauscher, Ruffridge, Saddler, Shaw, Stapp, Story, Sumner, Tilton, Tomaszewski, Vance, Wright And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Representative Saddler moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 143(RES) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There was objection. CSHB 143(RES) will advance to third reading on tomorrow's calendar.